Perhaps Not everyone carrying an axe is really a lumberjack
Ever seen a lumberjack in a casino? Not likely, since most lumberjacks do not generally carry their axes around with them on evenings out. But two stories have popped up in the news showing that non-lumberjacks don’t necessarily stick to these rules.
Axing For Trouble
The first of these two tales of violence happened in a town club in Fontaniva, Italy, where a disgruntled gambler decided to exact his revenge on some unsuspecting slots machines after losing 5,000 euros (over $6,500) in 2 weeks.
The father of two, aged 48, was caught on CCTV cameras, footage of which has since stormed the media and video clip streaming sites, where people can watch the gambler smash up seven machines as nearby customers dive for cover.
After blowing down steam, the device hacker calmly strolls out of the bar, but perhaps not before giving a thumbs up towards the one-armed bandits. Either it was an indicator of victory, or a show of friendship towards these specific machines. Whenever dealing with crazy, interpretations are anybody’s guess.
The anger-released slot axe-murderer then waited calmly for arrest outside a nearby bar.
‘ He comes in here all the right time to relax and play the machines,’ said who owns the bar, whom chose probably wisely- to remain nameless. ‘ He’s had some wins, but he spends a great deal of money. He could be a laborer and only works every now and then.’ evidently, this might be one worker who keeps his own equipment handy.
‘He’s normally an extremely man that is quiet. He just moved in very calmly by having an axe and smashed all the machines. There had been a few customers they were terrified,’ he added by them at the time and.
The man was sentenced for six months for criminal damage and possession of an offensive weapon as a result of his strangely calm yet violent outburst. But prison overcrowding got him off with absolutely nothing more than a slap on the hand.
But Wait, There’s More…
The second of these two stories is really a bit more terrifying, once the axe was wielded not at the slots, but at a person in the employees at a betting shop in the Welsh capital of Cardiff.
Police reported that the ‘particularly violent’ event left the shop assistant at a Ladbrokes betting store in Cardiff ‘in a state of shock.’
Before raiding the till and making off with some cash, one of three suspects in the robbery was seen wielding an axe over his head, threatening the Ladbrokes’ worker with injury or worse if he didn’t comply.
A authorities spokesperson investigating the crime stated that two men, both ski that is wearing, entered the bookie’s shop at 9:30 pm regarding the night of the incident. One calmly endured guard at the doorway, while the other violently threatened the assistant aided by the tree-chopping gun.
The frightened store assistant then handed over what police called a ‘quantity of cash,’ while the men fled the scene in a getaway car driven by a third suspect.
Police are now appealing to the public that is local information that could help apprehend the violent criminals, as unlike the Italian axe-wielder, they certainly did perhaps not wait calmly for arresting officers to show up in the scene.
Whose Casino Is It Anyway? Boston and Everett, Mass. Duke It Out
The battle continues over who gets to vote on Everett casino plan
While each and every of the three certification battles for casino resort projects in Massachusetts has already established its share of drama, none has proven more contentious than the fight on the casino slated to be located in the greater Boston area. Now, one Boston candidate that is mayoral threatening a lawsuit over one such proposition that would put a casino in the neighboring town of Everett.
The legal option is regarding the concept that neighboring communities could be affected by casino projects, but won’t have an opportunity to vote on whether those casinos must certanly be opened in the first place. Suffolk District Attorney Daniel F. Conley, a candidate for mayor of Boston, has been one of the handful of applicants whom have recommended that all of Boston should be able to vote on a casino that could be positioned in East Boston, as an example.
When it comes towards the proposed Wynn casino project in Everett, Conley claims that allowing only Everett residents to vote about it is unfair to the surrounding communities. If the East Boston proposal fail, then, he would register suit to stop the Everett casino based on the impact it could have on many Boston areas.
‘The Wynn proposal ended up being voted…on in only one community,’ Conley said during a press conference at City Hall Plaza, ‘while residents and businesses from Charlestown to Somerville and beyond will keep its traffic, economic, and burdens that are social receive none of the proposed advantages.’
In line with the state laws that produced the window of opportunity for three casinos that are new Massachusetts, only communities hosting casinos actually obtain a vote on whether or not to permit the projects to be built. However, casino developers are needed to negotiate payment royal vegas loyalty points, with arbitration required in the event that gambling enterprises and local governments can’t arrived at a resolution on their own.
Conley has proposed taking a path that is not actually outlined in the 2011 casino law when it comes to the East Boston casino proposal, one that’s being manufactured by Caesars Entertainment and Suffolk Downs. He could have the entire city of Boston vote on whether to accept the proposal, while nevertheless giving East Boston veto power over the whole vote. The casino would have to pass votes in both East Boston alone and across the entire city in order to be approved in other words.
Yay or Nay?
A Boston Globe survey found that six of the eight mayoral candidates who answered that question were in favor of it, with just two coming out against it (with Conley and one other candidate not answering the question) while Conley has not specified whether or not he supports the East Boston casino proposal. Meanwhile, four of ten candidates supported allowing the city that is entire vote on the casino, while six favored limiting the vote to just East Boston. Another poll of Boston residents unearthed that 44% were and only the casino, while 37% opposed it.
Regardless if voters return these proposals, only one will ultimately be chosen by hawaii while the future site of a casino in the Boston area. Along side the Everett and East Boston casino plans, addititionally there is a proposal that is competing Crossroads Massachusetts to place a casino in Milford.
Labour MP Disses Sports Books, Takes Donation from Retired Bookie CEO
Chuka Umunna, taken to task for accepting donation
Chuka Umunna, cited as the rising star of the united kingdom’s Labour Party who has publicly announced his discontent towards the bookmaking industry got his or her own hand caught in the sports book cookie container after accepting a contribution of £20,000 (more than $30,000) from the retired premier sports betting company CEO.
Slaps Bookies While Accepting Donation
As a gambling shop critic whom has publicly decried the number of betting shops, Umunna nonetheless accepted the large contribution from chairman emeritus of the Gala Coral Group, Neil Goulden, causing people of the Conservative Party to call the shadow business secretary out, claiming Umunna is guilty of adopting double standards.
Since Gala Coral Group is one for the largest bookies in Britain and accounts for the large numbers of betting outlets, with 1,800 bookies throughout the nation- it just didn’t really read well.
Umunna has even attacked the industry directly with a campaign aimed at reducing the spread of bookies and betting shops in the neighborhood roads of his London that is south Streatham, and went as far as to promise ‘new powers to get a grip on the number of betting shops.’
‘I understand there was concern that is huge some streets in our area are steadily filling with betting shops and payday loan companies that take advantage of our community, rather than help us,’ wrote Umunna in a written report to local voters earlier this year.
‘ Can anyone really credibly believe anything Chuka ever Umunna claims?’ questioned Tory Party vice-chairman Bob Neill. ‘He says something in public and does another behind closed doors. Their hypocrisy seems to be limitless.’ And that is very uncommon for the politician.
Spared on a Technicality
Nevertheless, fighting back in the corner of the Labour Party MP, a spokesperson for Umunna reported that ‘this donation was made by an individual Labour Party supporter in a personal capacity, and was accepted in respect utilizing the guidelines and correctly declared.’
Officially, the donation from Goulden was registered as being made ‘to support the workplace of Chuka Umunna in his capacity as Shadow Secretary of State for Business, as well as for staffing,’ so it will officially pass as legitimate.
And even though Goulden is no more a relative mind of the Gala Coral Group of operations, the ten years he invested as managing director, chief executive and chairman of the group means that he still provides consultancy services and chairs the Responsible Gaming Trust.
Whether it’s a totally innocent contribution or not, and whether or otherwise not the Conservative Party that are searching to destroy the publicity of a rival MP by claiming hypocrisy, Umunna was still a bit red-faced when the news broke, especially after taking this type of difficult stance against the spread of the industry in their neighborhood constituency.
‘ The only thing we know he undoubtedly believes is that the capital is full of ‘trash’ and ‘C-list’ wannabes,’ claimed Bob Neill.
Umunna, who is considered to be described as a future Labour Party leader, has already experienced his share that is fair of as earlier this present year his workplace ended up being accused of editing his Wikipedia page to exhibit comparisons between himself and Barack Obama.